Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Trump is lost on Iran

Caught between what he sees as two unacceptable courses of action, the president alternates between blustery threats and promises of imminent deals.

Trump stock black-and-white
U.S. President Donald Trump participates in an arrival ceremony at Beijing International Airport, May 13, 2026. Credit: Daniel Torok/White House.
Michael Makovsky is president and CEO of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA), a leading Washington, D.C.-based policy and educational organization focused on U.S. defense and national security issues in the Middle East.
Blaise Misztal is vice president for policy at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA), a leading Washington, D.C.-based policy and educational organization focused on U.S. defense and national security issues in the Middle East.

U.S. President Donald Trump despises losers but is increasingly looking like one in the Iran war. When Iran most recently violated the two-month-old ceasefire, launching 35 missiles and drones, the United States responded not with epic fury but with a slap on the wrist, suggesting epic weakness. Instead, Trump should seize on these Iranian violations to restart military operations, restore American credibility and end this war not with a deal, but a powerful bang.

The 40-day U.S.-Israel military campaign advanced, if not fully fulfilled, many of Trump’s stated objectives: decapitating Iran’s leadership, sinking most of its navy, damaging some of its nuclear facilities and degrading its ballistic-missile capability.

Yet on April 8, with the Iranian regime reeling, and the U.S. and Israeli militaries reportedly having about two more weeks of strikes in their campaign plans, Trump agreed to a ceasefire to negotiate a deal. On April 13, he ordered the blockade of Iranian oil exports, believing, wrongly, it would force the regime to make major concessions in a deal.

Ever since, Trump has been stuck. To his credit, he so far refused to accept a deal that would—like the one former Presidents Barack Obama struck and Joe Biden sought—enrich the regime while only partially and temporarily limiting Iran’s nuclear program. But he also has avoided resuming military operations, cowed by Iran’s ability to block non-Iranian oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz, sending gasoline prices to $5 per gallon.

Caught between what he sees as two unacceptable courses of action, Trump alternates between blustery threats and promises of imminent deals, further undermining his credibility.

Yet the president continues to display worrying signs of desperation for a deal. The U.S. response to Iran’s ceasefire violation was not even proportionate—just a handful of strikes. And earlier this week, Trump acceded to Iranian threats to walk away from negotiations if he didn’t prevent Israel from bombing Hezbollah, which has been raining down missiles and drones on Israel’s northern towns. Undermining the security of our valiant wartime partner, Israel, to save Iran’s main proxy only made a good deal and Israel-Lebanon peace more remote.

Through his pursuit of a deal, Trump has demoralized the Iranian people, whose rescue he promised in January, triggering this war. This abandonment not only undermines American credibility but harms our war effort, for it is the Iranian people who will issue the final verdict of this war—and Trump’s credibility—by whether or not they feel emboldened to rise up against the Islamic Republic.

Trump’s current, losing course will have grave consequences beyond Iran. The image of a weak, vulnerable, unsteady America is a Chinese victory. It means allies that rely on a strong America, such as the United Arab Emirates, Japan and Taiwan, will emerge weaker or turn away.

A perceived loss in this war will also have domestic consequences. It will permanently damage the Trump administration and the chances of a Republican winning the 2028 presidential election. It will also undermine the argument for a strong U.S. national security and embolden the isolationists on the right, as well as much of the Democratic Party.

With this much and more hanging in the balance, Trump has to win this war. He must do so emphatically with a bang, not a whimper. There can be no deal, which would only legitimize and enrich the regime.

That requires the United States to resume military operations for a few weeks to severely damage remaining Iranian missile and nuclear facilities, and open the Strait. And Trump must create conditions for regime collapse by damaging Iran’s energy facilities, such as its refineries, gas pipelines and transmission grids, and effectively turn off the lights on the regime. He should also consider rendering inoperable Iran’s oil exports facilities on Kharg Island.

Then he should take a page from his own handling of the 12-day war against Iran a year ago. He should simply state that the United States and Israel accomplished what they needed for now, will ensure that Iran doesn’t resume its nuclear program, and will support the Iranian people in every way possible, including providing weapons to any Iranian willing to fight the regime.

There are risks in this course, including Iranian retaliation against Gulf Arab energy facilities. And new actions will certainly spike oil prices in the short term to the unfortunate detriment of the average American. But it will mean a victory for the United States and U.S. security, and our standing, as well as the president’s.

Trump risks converting an impressive military campaign into a strategic failure by sticking with a disastrous two-month ceasefire that squanders American leverage and reeks of weakness. Preventing a nuclear Iran, restoring American credibility and advancing U.S. national security requires ending this war quickly but forcefully.

Originally published on JINSA Insight.

“Hundreds of Radwan Force operatives crossed the Litani River. Why did they come?” asks a senior IDF official.
Opposition to a Palestinian state surged to 79% in the aftermath of the Hamas attack.
Capt. Eitan Shmuel Lemberg was killed when an anti-tank missile struck his tank north of the Litani River, a day after a U.S.-brokered ceasefire proposal was announced.
“Policymakers should ask whether the hotline is translating into tangible support for victims, or simply redirecting people to organizations that are already doing that work,” the director of the American Jewish Committee’s Seattle office told JNS
Rep. Max Miller accused the Michigan Democrat of backing Hezbollah during debate over her resolution seeking to block U.S. military involvement in Lebanon.
“The victim was choked, thrown to the ground, punched, beaten and had her hair ripped out as passengers attempted to intervene too late,” the Combat Antisemitism Movement stated.