Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

British university accused of ‘absolute failure’ to address professor’s biased conduct

More than 400 academics sign a letter calling out a professor for “morally reprehensible” comments that “risk the personal security and well-being of Jewish students and, more widely, Jews in the U.K.”

University of Bristol Professor David Miller in 2016. Source: Screenshot.
University of Bristol Professor David Miller in 2016. Source: Screenshot.

The United Kingdom’s Union of Jewish Students (UJS) and Bristol Jewish Society (J-Soc) have accused Bristol University of an “absolute failure of their duty of care” after the school refused to condemn the anti-Semitic conduct of a sociology professor.

In a statement released on Wednesday, UJS and Bristol J-Soc said their representatives had a virtual meeting with the university’s senior management a day earlier so that the school could present “a set of action points” they will be taking against sociology professor David Miller.

The student group said: “Unfortunately, the answer we received was that the university cannot tell us if any action is being taken. They also told us they are unable to publicly condemn the abuse Jewish students are receiving, in order to remain neutral.”

“Neutrality and silence in the face of the targeted attacks on Jewish students and their representative society and union is unacceptable and an absolute failure of their duty of care to Jewish students,” they added.

More than 400 academics from around the world signed an open letter on Tuesday accusing Miller of making “morally reprehensible” comments that “risk the personal security and well-being of Jewish students and, more widely, Jews in the U.K.”

The signatories noted that Miller specifically accused Jewish students of being “directed by the State of Israel” to pursue a “campaign of censorship” that endangers Muslim and Arab students. The letter said his depiction of Jewish students is “false, outrageous and breaks all academic norms regarding the acceptable treatment of students.”

The professor also previously described J-Soc and UJS as “formally members of the Zionist movement” and described the “movement” as “an ‘enemy’ to be ‘targeted.’ ”

The letter added that Miller’s “singling out of individual student leaders within those organizations emphasizes the threatening nature of his remarks.”

It was not the first time Miller has raised concerns: Jewish students filed a complaint in 2019 regarding a lecture slide presentation that blamed the “Zionist movement” as one of the “five pillars of Islamophobia.”

Limor Son Har-Melech, who introduced the bill and whose husband was murdered in a 2003 terror attack, stated that the “historic law” means “whoever chooses to murder Jews because they are Jews forfeits their right to live.”
Either Iran “agrees to abide by international law, or a coalition of nations from around the world and the region will make sure that it’s open,” the U.S. secretary of state said.
Lawyers for the council said that Queens councilmember Vickie Paladino sought the subpoenas “with the sole purpose of creating a public spectacle.”
The holiday appears as “a living educational framework—a connection between Jewish communities in Israel and abroad, and a reflection of the strength of these communities across generations.”
“It becomes comfort, continuity and a way to feel connected to tradition and to one another at home,” Talia Sabag, of the Manischewitz parent company Kayko, told JNS.
The mayor said the NYPD informed him of the alleged firebombing plot against Within Our Lifetime co-founder Nerdeen Kiswani a day after a New Jersey man was charged for the threat.