Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

North Dakota signs anti-BDS legislation

The law demonstrates “North Dakota’s firm commitment to Israel,” said William Daroff, CEO of the Conference of Presidents.

The North Dakota State Capitol in Bismarck. Credit: Farragutful via Wikimedia Commons.
The North Dakota State Capitol in Bismarck. Credit: Farragutful via Wikimedia Commons.

North Dakota has become the 35th state to pass a law countering the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

The legislation—with nine sponsors and signed by Gov. Doug Burgum—prevents those contracting with the state from participating in boycotts of Israel and bars the state from investing in companies that “would have the effect of requiring or inducing any person to boycott Israel.”

William Daroff, CEO of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, praised the “nearly unanimous” passage of the law, which, he stated, demonstrates “North Dakota’s firm commitment to Israel, as the goal of the BDS Movement is to end Israel’s existence as a Jewish state.”

“The BDS movement and its organizers do not seek peace in the Middle East, but rather to destroy Israel and the promise of the Jewish homeland through targeted economic warfare,” he added.

Other states that have passed anti-BDS legislation in recent years include Arkansas, Texas, Iowa, Utah, Missouri, Idaho and West Virginia.

“He wants to flex his authority as mayor of New York City, so he brings the desk outside to show he should be taken seriously,” Beverly Hallberg, president of District Media Group, told JNS.
The former chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee “was a leading force against efforts to delegitimize our ally Israel,” AIPAC stated.
Defense for Children International–Palestine cited Israeli restrictions following its designation by Jerusalem as part of a network linked to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
The anti-Israel pro-Hamas activist still has a case pending in federal court, preventing his removal for now.
The eight-count indictment describes written plans in a notebook, dashcam recordings and plans for mass casualties near Gracie Mansion during dueling protests.
“True threats of violence are not protected by the First Amendment,” U.S. Attorney Darin Smith stated.