Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Europe is burying its head in the sand when it comes to jihadi terror

Europe still believes that denial is the best way to cope with radical Islam, but time and again we see that denying the existence of a problem doesn’t solve it.

Eyal Zisser is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University.

The jihadist war being waged by radical Islamist groups across the globe has never stopped at the gates of holy sites and places of worship. Indeed, worshippers in these places have become legitimate and convenient targets for the jihadists in the Middle East, Africa and Asia—as we learned from the recent massacre in Sri Lanka—and in recent years in Europe as well.

Minority communities, mostly Christians, are persecuted in large portions of the Islamic world, and the tolerance once shown to Jews and Christians has now been replaced by extremism threatening the continued existence of Christianity in these places. Some 70 years after the end of Jewish life in Iraq and Syria due to persecution and expulsions, the Middle East’s Christian community is now disappearing.

The Islamic State group has engaged in the systematic destruction of churches in the territories it has held, but churches are attacked and often burned as a matter of routine in other Arab and Muslim countries, which are struggling, despite the efforts of their rulers, to protect their Christian minorities. The extremists also don’t spare mosques that don’t share their radical views and have targeted them in tens and hundreds of attacks within the framework of jihad.

In light of these attacks, Europe’s voice has barely been heard. Due to their desire to maintain political correctness, European governments have failed to stand in defense of Christian communities in the Middle East, Asia and Africa, out of fear they would be perceived as enemies of Islam.

It’s interesting to note that radical Islam has found a partner in the form of the neo-Nazi far-right, whose members are behind hate crimes against Jewish synagogues, for example the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, but also against Muslim mosques, the most recent case being in New Zealand. In the Israeli context, these two camps are joined by the far-left, which is flooding Europe with a tidal wave of anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sentiment.

Jihad, however, made its way to European shores a while ago. Alongside numerous terrorist attacks, it has been reported in recent years in France alone that hundreds of churches have been attacked by extremists, the majority of them Muslim. The authorities in Europe silence this, too. They apparently believe the most effective way to contend with extremism and terrorism is to ignore and contain it, in the hope that it will simply disappear.

The question of Europe’s approach to radical Islam has resurfaced in the wake of the fire at Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, one of France’s most important historical and religious symbols. The reason for the blaze is still unknown, and it could be that a technical mishap—the site was under renovation—was behind the fire.

Yet it was fascinating to see the outrage in Europe toward anyone who hinted at the possibility of arson, perhaps by extremists. After all, as stated, in France alone hundreds of churches have been attacked in recent years—and threats were made to target Notre Dame. No one is allowed to suggest this possibility, however. This is also the approach, particularly in France, to any terrorist attack that takes place on the continent, where the jihadist aspect is blurred and disregarded.

Europe still believes that burying its head in the sand is the best way to cope with the challenge posed by radical Islam, but time and again we see that denying the existence of a problem doesn’t solve it.

We can assume the problem will only worsen in light of Europe’s failure to absorb the waves of Muslim immigration to the continent. These immigrants currently represent less than 5 percent of the entire population of Europe, but that could spike to 20 percent and even a quarter of the population due to low natural birth rates among native Europeans. And the ratio of Muslims in some large European cities, such as Paris or Brussels, is already around 20 percent or higher. An effort to absorb these immigrants and accommodate them across the continent—while also fighting radical Islam with determination—is, therefore, the order of the day, but in Europe, no one is ready to acknowledge this challenge, let alone tackle it.

Eyal Zisser is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University.

This column first appeared on Israel Hayom.

“The IDF will continue to act with determination in order to neutralize threats,” the top officials said in a statement.
“Our farmers are very happy,” the U.S. president told reporters at the White House.
Speaking at the JNS International Policy Summit in Jerusalem, Glick described information warfare as the “eighth front” facing Israel and warned that antisemitic content is increasingly amplified online for political and financial gain.
The U.S. treasury secretary justified the move by saying that “Iran has committed to free and open transit in the Strait of Hormuz and to permit International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors into the country.”
The mediating parties stated that both sides agreed “upon a road map toward reaching a final deal within 60 days.”
The conflict with Hezbollah should be resolved through direct talks between Jerusalem and Beirut, “and not by Iranian extortion,” said the Israeli president.
Benny Gantz, JNS editor-in-chief Jonathan S. Tobin, Gilad Erdan, Mosab Hassan Yousef, Nissim Black and leading voices in security, diplomacy, media, law and Jewish communal affairs headline the summit’s third day in Jerusalem.