Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Israel needs an iron will more than an Iron Dome

By providing an excuse to delay taking decisive action against the terrorist threat on Israel’s southern border, is the air-defense system making the situation worse?

An Iron Dome air-defense missile battery in central Israel on May 15, 2019. Photo by Flash90.
An Iron Dome air-defense missile battery in central Israel on May 15, 2019. Photo by Flash90.
Zahava Englard Shapiro is a Jerusalem based author and writes books, articles, and news analysis focusing on Israel and other matters of Jewish interest.

Is Israel’s Iron Dome air-defense system suppressing the country’s will to take definitive action against terrorist groups in the Gaza Strip? With Israel facing the prospect of a two-front war on its northern and southern borders, the influential role the Iron Dome has on Israel’s military strategic planning bears examination.

Developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries, the Iron Dome is a mobile, all-weather defense system capable of intercepting enemy rockets before they land. Following the barrage of 690 rockets that were launched at Israel from Gaza in May 2019, the system’s success rate was calculated at 86 percent.

Looking past the cold numbers, however, the remaining 14 percent, which resulted in four deaths in Israel this spring, translates into lives and property destroyed. These numbers, of course, also do not take into account the devastating trauma inflicted on Israel’s southern population, who have been living under fire for more than a decade.

This is a high price to have to pay each time Israel’s undeterred enemies decide to launch missiles at its population.

But even if is willing to accept that price, there is also the fact that the Iron Dome provides Israel with an excuse to delay a military offensive that would finally end the threat on Israel’s southern border. Rather than just raising a defensive shield, Israel should be wiping its enemies out.

The Iron Dome is in effect a high-tech Band-Aid, and Israel’s disproportionate reliance on it is allowing Iran’s proxy armies to gain strength, in addition to enabling them to paralyze significant portions of the country at will.

For all its impressive ability to protect Israel’s population, an over-reliance on this type of defense system, which offers no measure of deterrence, seems to carry with it the consequence of perpetuating the threat rather than eliminating it.

The Iron Dome most certainly has a well-deserved place in Israel’s defensive arsenal, but it is not a strategy. To survive, Israel needs an iron will far more than an Iron Dome.

Zahava Englard Shapiro is an Israeli-based author and writes articles on Israel for several online publications.

The mediating parties stated that both sides agreed “upon a road map toward reaching a final deal within 60 days.”
The conflict with Hezbollah should be resolved through direct talks between Jerusalem and Beirut, “and not by Iranian extortion,” said the Israeli president.
“Once the rift between the regime and the people is so deep, you cannot tell when such a regime will fall,” said the premier.
Iran “will never have a nuclear weapon,” the American ambassador said.
Vice President JD Vance delayed his trip in the wake of hostilities between Israel and Iranian-backed Hezbollah.
The Jerusalem gathering presents a 12-forum blueprint to fight antisemitism, reshape policy and strengthen the Jewish state’s security and global standing.
Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana, Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon, JNS Editor-In-Chief Jonathan S. Tobin, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s adviseer Caroline Glick and leading voices in diplomacy, technology, national security, law, media and faith headline the summit’s second day in Jerusalem.