update desk

UC Berkeley tables vote on adopting IHRA resolution

Opponents of the measure claimed that if passed, it would stifle anti-Israel speech and actions at the school.

The campus of the University of California, Berkeley. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.
The campus of the University of California, Berkeley. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

The student senate at the University of California, Berkeley tabled a measure last week that would have adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. 

The move came after hours of debate about the bill and drew criticism from pro-Israel supporters. 

“Defining and recognizing antisemitism and hate is a critical first step toward our collective goal of making UC Berkeley a safer and more inclusive space for Jewish students and all students,” Hillel at the University of California, Berkeley, wrote in a post on social media expressing disappointment with the vote.

It also noted that many students “shared their personal lived experiences with antisemitism and brought their unique perspectives to this very personal issue.”

The Anti-Defamation League tweeted: “Students and communities—inclusive of the Jewish community—that face marginalization, oppression and hate have the right to define for themselves what that looks like.”

Opponents of the measure claimed that if the school were to adopt IHRA’s definition, it would essentially stifle anti-Israel speech and actions.

According to Amcha Initiative, an antisemitism watchdog group that tracks incidents on college campuses, prior to the vote, anti-Israel students, professors and others issued a letter opposing the IHRA, saying, “As Palestinian students, this working definition of antisemitism directly violates our freedom of speech by equating anti-zionism to antisemitism and censoring any criticism of Israel.

Last week’s vote comes some six months after nine student groups at Berkeley School of Law made headlines after announcing they would not invite any speakers who support “Zionism, the apartheid State of Israel and the occupation of Palestine.”

The move led to accusations that the groups were instituting “Jew-free zones,” a claim denied by the school’s dean, Erwin Chermerinsky.

To date, the IHRA definition has been adopted by more than 1,000 entities.

You have read 3 articles this month.
Register to receive full access to JNS.

Just before you scroll on...

Israel is at war.

JNS is combating the stream of misinformation on Israel with real, honest and factual reporting. In order to deliver this in-depth, unbiased coverage of Israel and the Jewish world, we rely on readers like you.

The support you provide allows our journalists to deliver the truth, free from bias and hidden agendas. Can we count on your support?

Every contribution, big or small, helps JNS.org remain a trusted source of news you can rely on.

Become a part of our mission by donating today
Thank you. You are a loyal JNS Reader.
You have read more than 10 articles this month.
Please register for full access to continue reading and post comments.
Never miss a thing
Get the best stories faster with JNS breaking news updates