OpinionU.S.-Israel Relations

The future of Judea and Samaria

If what is outlined as part of the Trump administration’s Mideast peace plan goes forward, this may yet be recorded by historians as the golden age of Israel-American relations.

A view of Beitar Illit and Tzur Hadassah, as seen from Gush Etzion in Judea and Samaria, on Nov. 25, 2019. Photo by Gershon Elinson/Flash90.
A view of Beitar Illit and Tzur Hadassah, as seen from Gush Etzion in Judea and Samaria, on Nov. 25, 2019. Photo by Gershon Elinson/Flash90.
Jerold S. Auerbach
Jerold S. Auerbach is the author of 12 books, including Print to Fit: The New York Times, Zionism and Israel (1896-2016) and Israel 1896-2016, selected for Mosaic by Ruth Wisse and Martin Kramer as a “Best Book for 2019.”

It’s been more than half a century since the Six-Day War returned Judea and Samaria, the biblical homeland of the Jewish people, to Israel. Until 1967, it had been the “West Bank” of the Kingdom of Jordan, won in 1948 during the Arab war to annihilate the fledgling Jewish state. By now, more than 460,000 Israelis live in settlements there among 2 million Palestinians. Described by critics as malevolent “settler-colonial” intruders occupying Palestinian land, they see themselves as Zionist pioneers in the Land of Israel.

Now that the Trump administration has recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights and Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, only the status of settlements in Judea and Samaria remains to define the boundaries of the Jewish state. U.S. President Donald Trump’s “Peace to Prosperity” plan, announced in January, promises to extend Israeli sovereignty over settlements and the Jordan Valley, Israel’s eastern-most defensible border.

It was followed by U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo’s assurance that it is Israel’s “right and obligation” to decide on annexation of that territory. The path is now clear for Israel to restore sovereignty over most of its ancient homeland and secure its border with Jordan.

The plan offers a range of enticements to Palestinians. Among them: the right of self-government; “necessary conditions for investment to start flowing into the region”; “a just, fair and realistic solution” for Palestinian refugees; “significant territorial expansion”; and “integration of the State of Palestine into the regional and global economy.” Predictably, Palestinian leaders, who for decades have shown no interest in any plan for peace with Israel, refused to consider the Trump administration proposal. They were not alone.

A loud chorus of American criticism erupted. Former President Jimmy Carter warned that the Trump Mideast plan “will doom the only viable solution to this long-running conflict, the two-state solution.” The plan, former American Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer claimed, “is snake-oil diplomacy—packaging useless ideas and trying to market them as innovative.” For David Makovsky, a member of former Secretary of State John Kerry’s Middle East negotiating team, “It reaffirms the worst fears that this is more an annexation plan than a peace plan.”

True to form, The New York Times, reflexively critical of every Trump decision about anything, chimed in. Jerusalem bureau chief David Halbfinger and Isabel Kershner lamented that the plan “deprives the Palestinians of nearly everything they have been fighting for,” but, revealingly, never willing to compromise with Israel for peace. Daniel Pipes, president of the Middle East Forum, mournfully anticipated that “annexation of the West Bank would probably damage Israel’s relations with the Trump administration, the Democrats, Europeans and Arab leaders, as well as destabilize the region, radicalize the Israeli Left, and harm the Zionist goal of a Jewish state.”

Times of Israel editor David Horovitz, a disillusioned leftist ever since the second Palestinian intifada and now a strong critic of Benjamin Netanyahu, questioned whether the Israeli prime minister wants “his legacy determined by a decision to revive full Israeli rule in parts of the biblically resonant Judea and Samaria.” (And why not?) Horovitz anticipated “allegations of racism” against Israel, with “two sets of laws—one for Jews and another for Palestinians,” and “the demise of the two-state solution.”

None of this is persuasive. American relations with Israel will surely be strengthened by the Trump administration plan. Democratic Party opposition is irrelevant; the dormant Israeli left has all but vanished. With the biblical Land of Israel part of the State of Israel, the plan is cause for celebration, not lamentation, by Israel and its American supporters.

There can be little doubt that if implemented, the peace plan would mark the most generous gift to Israel from a U.S. president in seven decades. Not since Harry Truman recognized the birth of Israel minutes after its Proclamation of Independence has an American president responded so favorably to the Jewish state.

With a trifecta of blessings—recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights; relocating the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem; and now the proposal to extend Israeli sovereignty over Jewish settlements in Judea, Samaria and the Jordan Valley—the Trump administration, to the evident dismay of Jewish critics in the United States and Israel, has left an indelible imprint on Jewish history.

With Netanyahu in power for another year-and-a-half (and an agreement with his opposition partner Benny Gantz to apply Israeli sovereignty to settlements and the Jordan Valley), and Trump in power at least long enough to guarantee and protect the gifts his administration has bestowed on Israel, this may yet be recorded by historians as the golden age of Israel-American relations.

For doubters on the left, it might be worth recalling that shortly before his assassination, former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin asserted: “The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley,” also including the Gush Etzion and Efrat settlements, along with “other communities” east of Israel’s constricted pre-Six-Day War boundaries.

So the ticking clock of history will mark the restoration of the biblical homeland of the Jewish people to its rightful inheritor: the State of Israel.

Jerold S. Auerbach is the author of “Print to Fit: The New York Times, Zionism and Israel 1896-2016,” which was recently selected for Mosaic by Ruth Wisse and Martin Kramer as a “Best Book” for 2019.

The opinions and facts presented in this article are those of the author, and neither JNS nor its partners assume any responsibility for them.
You have read 3 articles this month.
Register to receive full access to JNS.

Just before you scroll on...

Israel is at war.

JNS is combating the stream of misinformation on Israel with real, honest and factual reporting. In order to deliver this in-depth, unbiased coverage of Israel and the Jewish world, we rely on readers like you.

The support you provide allows our journalists to deliver the truth, free from bias and hidden agendas. Can we count on your support?

Every contribution, big or small, helps JNS.org remain a trusted source of news you can rely on.

Become a part of our mission by donating today
Thank you. You are a loyal JNS Reader.
You have read more than 10 articles this month.
Please register for full access to continue reading and post comments.
Never miss a thing
Get the best stories faster with JNS breaking news updates