OpinionIsrael at War

An Israeli perspective on the Gaza war

The Oct. 7 war has implications that stretch far beyond the Middle East.

Israeli troops operating in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, Nov. 16, 2023. Credit: IDF.
Israeli troops operating in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, Nov. 16, 2023. Credit: IDF.
Eran Lerman
Col. (ret.) Dr. Eran Lerman, former deputy director of the National Security Council, is the vice president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategic Studies.

The war imposed on Israel by Hamas on Oct. 7, is of crucial importance. It is not just another round of violence between Israel and Hamas, the radical Islamist terror organization that took over Gaza in 2007. The barbaric atrocities planned and executed by Hamas, and the magnitude of the destruction in the communities along the Gaza border, which was accompanied by rapes, killings and mutilations of bodies—leaving 1,200 Israelis dead, more than 4,000 wounded and 240 kidnapped, including women, children and the elderly—require a strong response. It is not just about the administration of justice and retribution, which is in itself justified, but about deterrence and defending the civilized world, with implications far beyond the region.

Israeli deterrence under threat

The Middle East is a tough neighborhood. Israel, a Jewish state surrounded by hostile Muslim entities, cannot survive unless it is militarily strong and its neighbors understand that an attack on it would be very costly. This is the essence of deterrence. Moreover, fear is the best political currency in the Middle East, and probably in other conflict-ridden regions.

The successful surprise attack perpetrated against Israel by Hamas has eroded the deterrence of the Jewish state. Perceived weakness invites aggression. Accordingly, it is imperative for Israel to restore deterrence. The need to rebuild lost deterrence explains the Israeli government’s decision to send the Israel Defense Forces into the Gaza Strip to dismantle Hamas’s military capabilities. The IDF mission will be a grand effort to decapitate the political and military leadership of Hamas, destroy its military arsenal and dismantle its industrial capability to manufacture missiles and other types of armaments.

Israel’s leadership, its army and its people understand this. Moreover, there is a clear realization that operating in an urban environment—and the inevitable tunnel warfare that these operations will entail—will be costly and lengthy. In light of the importance attributed to this war, Israel is ready to pay the price—whatever it may be. After 16 years of continuous attacks on Israel’s population, during which Israel has tried to contain Hamas and to deter it, the presence of such an aggressive and violent terrorist entity along its border is no longer tolerable.

The declared military objective cannot be accomplished without a large-scale ground operation. Airpower is important in destroying Hamas installations, but it has limitations, particularly when the enemy is hiding among a supportive population and finds refuge in well-designed and fortified tunnels. The presence of many civilians is a complicating factor, as well. Hamas’s strategy aims at maximizing the casualties among the Gazan population. Through the use of force, it prevents attempts by Gazan citizens to leave the war zone as they have been instructed to do by the IDF. Moreover, Hamas uses civilians as human shields—in violation of international law—hoping that the pictures coming from Gaza will create international pressure on Israel to stop its advance.

US involvement in the Israel-Hamas conflict

Israel has been encouraged by the American support rendered from the outset of the war. President Joseph Biden promised unconditional support for Israel and compared Hamas to Islamic State—a civilizational enemy. He announced additional military aid to Israel, including armaments and interceptors for the Iron Dome missile defense system, and emphasized that the United States would make sure that Israel would not run out of resources vital to the war effort. The United States dispatched a task force headed by an aircraft carrier to the Eastern Mediterranean, and later, sent another carrier to deter Iran and Hezbollah from joining the war against Israel. Washington also decided to deploy a nuclear submarine to the region. The U.S. secretaries of defense and state visited Israel, followed by the unprecedented visit of President Biden himself, demonstrating a high level of friendship.

The United States has become deeply involved, even directly influencing the conduct of the war itself. A corridor for humanitarian aid from Egypt was the result of American prodding, as was the restoration of the telephone and internet systems in Gaza, which were disrupted by Israel. Such American benevolence has been characterized by some as a “bear hug” which might negatively affect Israel’s freedom of action. One concern based on past experience is whether Washington will impose a ceasefire before Israel attains its objectives. Moreover, the naive obsession of the current American administration with a two-state solution—as well as its preference to bring the Palestinian Authority into power in Gaza, when it is hardly able to exercise its authority over Ramallah—is problematic.

Washington signaled through its involvement that the Gaza war is more than a just local Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is about the struggle for supremacy in world politics. Hamas is a tool for Iran, which is backed by Russia and China, to push the United States out of the Middle East. These revisionist powers oppose the community of democratic nations, whose strongest representative in the Middle East is Israel. Iran wants Israel’s demise not only due to religious fervor but also its recognition that it is the only state in the region that can prevent Iranian hegemony.

Despite the misguided American policy towards Iran (the attempt to reach a nuclear understanding), the military and political presence of the United States alongside Israel in the Eastern Mediterranean is an effort to preserve the status quo—and to halt Iran’s attempt to erase the existence of America’s best and strongest ally in the region. Isolating the conflict in Gaza has become a cardinal American interest.

Containing the conflict and implications for Taiwan

It seems that the Biden administration believes that the reverberations of the war on Hamas in Gaza might lead to a regional conflagration affecting other arenas, potentially including Ukraine and the South China Sea. Indeed, the war in Gaza is an important test of American leadership and credibility. America’s allies around the world look at its behavior for clues to how Washington might react to a crisis in their region. For example, Taiwan should be heartened by the quick American decision to dramatically increase its military presence in the Middle East. As noted, the United States started an airlift to provide Israel with ammunition and other military equipment. Similarly, Washington’s high-profile and vigorous diplomatic support for the Israeli government was very impressive. Significantly for Taiwan, Israel does not have a formal defense treaty with the United States that requires such American intervention on its behalf. Despite the absence of formal obligations, however, the United States has decisively stepped in to help its embattled ally.

The whole world is watching how effective American deterrent power is in this latest conflict in the Middle East. American success in deterring Iran from instigating a multi-front campaign has only had limited success. Hezbollah, Iran’s proxy in Lebanon, has initiated a low-intensity operation aimed at restraining Israeli advances in Gaza. The Houthis in Yemen, another proxy of Iran, have also opened an additional front by launching long-range missiles (with little accuracy) toward Israel, with American ships in the Red Sea and Israel’s anti-missile defenses intercepting most of them. Iran-supported Shi’ite militias have also attacked American bases in the region. Iran and its proxies are eroding the American ultimatum issued by President Joe Biden, and testing the American determination to respond militarily. The outcome of this confrontation will affect the reputation of the United States as a reliable ally and the thinking of its friends and foes.

Beijing, the primary rival of the United States in the international arena, has closely followed the Gaza war. The image projected by Washington during the war on Hamas will inevitably factor into future Chinese strategic calculations. Moreover, as the war crystallized the lines dividing the West and its opponents, China opted to side with Hamas—a civilizational enemy of the West. China’s voting at the UN National Security Council and the content of its media have shown a clear preference for Hamas. It has proven that it is in the same camp as Iran and Russia. This position has been very problematic for China, causing it to lose much goodwill in Europe and in the United States. Moreover, the more pragmatic Arab states that view Hamas—the Palestinian offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, which has a significant presence in Arab states such as Egypt—as a danger to their regimes are very displeased with the Chinese stance. Informally, they wish good luck to Israel in destroying the Islamist terrorist organization. In parallel, they are getting closer to the United States while simultaneously growing more suspicious of Chinese attempts to encroach on the Middle East.

Looking towards the future

Biden, by comparing Hamas to ISIS, clearly sees the war on Hamas in civilizational terms. He believes that the civilized world is challenged by the barbaric actions of Hamas. Iran unleashed Hamas as part of its struggle against the West, viewing the Western democracies as weak and riven by internal fractures. Israel looked vulnerable when domestic strife paralyzed its government. It looked weak when Washington emphasized its differences with Jerusalem. The fall of 2023 seemed an opportune time to attack Israel—the Western bastion in the Middle East. And in the United States, polarization and partisan bickering have hindered foreign policy decision-making. Elsewhere, the West is faced with an almost-nuclear Iran; a nuclear North Korea; and an expansionist Russia, all the while China is extending its malign influence over the globe. With these challenges in mind, President Biden decided to let Israel administer the same unforgiving treatment to Hamas as the United States did in its crusade against ISIS.

Yet, eradicating Hamas by force is not a realistic goal. Hamas represents a radical Islamist ideology that is utterly opposed to Western civilization and denies the right to the existence of a Jewish state. Unfortunately, this ideology has many adherents in the Muslim world. Moreover, Hamas has established kindergartens, schools, social services and mosques, ensuring that it is firmly entrenched in Palestinian society. Its messages are popular and fall on receptive Palestinian ears. In the 2005 Palestinian election (the last and only one) Hamas mustered a majority in the Palestinian parliament. Among Palestinians, a poll as recent as September 2023 showed that the Hamas candidate for prime minister has a 60% support rating in the Palestinian territories. All Israel can do is take out the accumulated military assets of Hamas in order to leave it harmless for the time being.

This means that even after the destruction of Hamas’s military capabilities, dormant cells belonging to the Islamist movement will aim to regain control of Gaza and continue the terrorist campaign against Israel that is its raison d’être. The struggle against any Western presence will continue indefinitely.

For many Israelis, the war on Hamas confirms their view that it is their destiny to live by the sword. Having a Jewish state requires sacrifice and determination. The murderous attack of Hamas has also elicited the best qualities of Israelis. Outnumbered Israeli soldiers and civilians fought courageously and ingeniously to limit the consequences of the Hamas slaughter. Israelis reported in great numbers to their reserve units, and long lines of young Israelis have gathered at overseas airports, queuing to get a seat to return home as soon as possible to report for combat duty. Volunteers go to the fields to replace farmers called for military duty and take care of the many displaced Israelis who had to leave their residences in the border communities.

Israel will eventually prevail, and by doing so it will also do a great favor to the civilized world, including Taiwan.

The main point: While Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel was undoubtedly devastating, Israel—bolstered by U.S. support—has already launched an effective counterattack. U.S. involvement in these efforts is particularly crucial, as it serves as a deterrent against further authoritarian attacks against democratic states like Taiwan.

Originally published by the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security.

The opinions and facts presented in this article are those of the author, and neither JNS nor its partners assume any responsibility for them.
You have read 3 articles this month.
Register to receive full access to JNS.

Just before you scroll on...

Israel is at war. JNS is combating the stream of misinformation on Israel with real, honest and factual reporting. In order to deliver this in-depth, unbiased coverage of Israel and the Jewish world, we rely on readers like you. The support you provide allows our journalists to deliver the truth, free from bias and hidden agendas. Can we count on your support? Every contribution, big or small, helps JNS.org remain a trusted source of news you can rely on.

Become a part of our mission by donating today
Thank you. You are a loyal JNS Reader.
You have read more than 10 articles this month.
Please register for full access to continue reading and post comments.
Never miss a thing
Get the best stories faster with JNS breaking news updates