Opinion

Getting Iran out of Syria: The Dayan formula

Having the audacity to use force, especially in a situation that hovers on the very real threshold of war, entails the risk of escalation, but also the potential to give Israel a prominent role in the crystallizing anti-Iran regional coalition.

Israeli politician and military leader Moshe Dayan on the night of Israel's June 30, 1981 elections. Dayan was the fourth Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, who later went on to become Defense Minister and Foreign Minister of Israel. Photo by Moshe Shai/Flash90.
Israeli politician and military leader Moshe Dayan on the night of Israel's June 30, 1981 elections. Dayan was the fourth Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, who later went on to become Defense Minister and Foreign Minister of Israel. Photo by Moshe Shai/Flash90.
Gershon Hacohen
Maj. Gen. (res.) Gershon Hacohen

The goal of the Israel Defense Forces’ activities in Syria, Israeli Defense Minister Naftali Bennett said during a recent press conference, is “to cause Iran to give up its attempt to entrench itself in Syria.” However, military correspondents have reported that in the assessment of the IDF General Staff, it is doubtful whether expanding offensive activity—however successful—can cause Tehran to renounce its ambitions in Syria.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are driven by an expansionist Islamist ideology. While the constraints of reality are certainly forcing them to adapt, that is not the same as forsaking their imperialist vision.

A historical perspective is needed here.

Having been enjoined to make sweeping changes to its order of battle in the wake of Israel’s War of Independence, the IDF found it difficult to find a workable solution to the fedayeen terrorism of the early 1950s. With the forming of Commando Unit 101 and its merging with the Paratroopers Brigade under the leadership of Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan, a retaliation model gradually developed as a response to this problem.

It quickly transpired, however, that despite a string of operational successes, the approach did not bring about a real decline in fedayeen terror.

The Israeli government was perplexed, but Dayan, with his quintessential creativity, reinterpreted the logic of the retaliation operations and posed a different systemic objective for them. Identifying the gap between the tactical aspects of the operations and their strategic significance, he introduced a groundbreaking conceptual framework that gave renewed relevance to the retaliatory actions.

Although the deterrence of fedayeen terrorism continued to be the immediate rationale behind the retaliation policy, it was oriented toward a wider objective: positioning Israel and its military prowess in the evolving regional and international system. In Dayan’s words: “Our victories and our failures in small battles along and across the border are of great importance. Not only because of their direct effect on day-to-day security, but also because of their impact on how the Arabs assess Israel’s power and Israel’s belief in its power.”

In that way, a strategic framework was created that was open to regional developments in anticipation of two possible courses of action: either the ongoing retaliatory strikes would gradually curtail the terror, or they would lead to war and a new regional order.

Meanwhile, by taking the opportunity to undertake operational friction with the regular forces of Egypt, Jordan and Syria, the IDF built up its capability and established an awareness of that capability in the eyes of both the enemy and the international arena. The quality of the IDF’s performance in these operations undoubtedly contributed to the eventual collaboration with France and Britain in the 1956 Sinai Campaign.

Applying Dayan’s thinking to today’s strategic context, the fighting against Iranian forces in Syria, especially on the Golan border, can be viewed as a means of initiating a clash with those forces out of a defensive motive rather than a direct interest in a full-fledged war.

Having the audacity to use force, especially in a situation that hovers on the very real threshold of war, does entail the risk of escalation, but also holds the potential to give Israel a prominent role in the crystallizing anti-Iran regional coalition. The objective of such a clash would be to showcase Israel’s operational superiority by proving its military capability and strategic daring, thereby making clear that Jerusalem does not fear a military conflict in defense of its vital interests.

A goal of that kind, in the spirit of Dayan’s conceptualization and in contrast to Bennett’s clear-cut and closed formulation, can manage unforeseen and uncontrollable developments. Therein lies its special nature as an achievable strategic objective.

Maj. Gen. (res.) Gershon Hacohen is a senior research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. He served in the IDF for 42 years. He commanded troops in battles with Egypt and Syria. He was formerly a corps commander and commander of the IDF Military Colleges.

This article was first published by the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies.

The opinions and facts presented in this article are those of the author, and neither JNS nor its partners assume any responsibility for them.
You have read 3 articles this month.
Register to receive full access to JNS.

Just before you scroll on...

Israel is at war. JNS is combating the stream of misinformation on Israel with real, honest and factual reporting. In order to deliver this in-depth, unbiased coverage of Israel and the Jewish world, we rely on readers like you. The support you provide allows our journalists to deliver the truth, free from bias and hidden agendas. Can we count on your support? Every contribution, big or small, helps JNS.org remain a trusted source of news you can rely on.

Become a part of our mission by donating today
Topics
Comments
Thank you. You are a loyal JNS Reader.
You have read more than 10 articles this month.
Please register for full access to continue reading and post comments.
Never miss a thing
Get the best stories faster with JNS breaking news updates