Newsletter
Newsletter Support JNS

Palestinian elections: Why now?

Whether or not P.A. leader Mahmoud Abbas’s announcement of the first Palestinian elections in more than a decade was intended for the incoming U.S. administration, it poses a problem for Israel.

Then-U.S. Vice President Joe Biden with Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah, March 9, 2016. Credit: Flash90.
Then-U.S. Vice President Joe Biden with Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah, March 9, 2016. Credit: Flash90.
Eyal Zisser is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University.

Mahmoud Abbas has been president of the Palestinian Authority for 16 years, and in its name, he rules over the Palestinian population in Judea and Samaria. He has vigorously avoided holding elections, despite having originally been elected for a four-year term, apparently not feeling he needs them to maintain his legitimacy in the eyes of the world or his subjects.

It was always possible to blame Israel for impeding elections, but truth be told, Abbas himself didn’t want them and even feared them. After all, the last elections, in 2006, were calamitous for him and the Palestinians in general, with the Hamas terror movement winning a majority, paving its path to seize control of the Gaza Strip. Today, the only barrier between Hamas and Abbas’s seat in Ramallah is the Israeli security forces, a fact of which Abbas is well aware.

Now, however, he has altered course and even reached an agreement with Hamas, albeit a rather suspicious one.

We can hardly assume Abbas has suddenly decided to trust Hamas. Nor does the Palestinian population appear overly eager or even interested in elections. Certainly, there is no ground-level pressure to hold them.

Abbas will celebrate his 86th birthday this year—not the age at which one embarks on a new political career or goes to elections. And generally speaking, in the Palestinian Authority as in other parts of the Arab world, leaders aren’t chosen in elections in any case, but are rather decided upon behind the scenes—and sometimes after violent, bloody power struggles. Elections are just for appearances, to lend legitimacy to leaders who have in fact already won power.

It’s possible the election announcement was intended for the ears of the new tenant in the White House, with the aim of ushering in a new era of relations between the Palestinians and Washington. Indeed, Biden’s administration will likely be more receptive than its predecessor to a well-rehearsed pretense of democracy.

Either way, these declared elections in the Palestinian Authority pose a dilemma for Israel. In 2006, under pressure from the friendly U.S. administration of President George W. Bush, Israel allowed Hamas to run, despite the terrorist organization’s refusal to recognize the Oslo Accords. The results are history, and Israel cannot afford to fall into the same trap or succumb to similar pressure.

At any rate, it’s doubtful they will be held. But even if the Palestinians do head to voting stations, at the very most these elections might change some of the faces we have grown accustomed to, though they certainly won’t bring about any real change on the ground.

Eyal Zisser is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University.

This article first appeared in Israel Hayom.

“This week we are reminded that with true faith, eternal hope and the power of prayer, nothing can stop the people of God.”
Strikes hit money exchange offices linked to terror financing in Beirut; IDF slays Hajj Yusuf Ismail Hashem, commander of the Shi’ite group’s Southern Front.
Israeli Air Force tanker aircraft have supported the operations, conducting approximately 2,000 aerial refuelings.
U.S. President Donald Trump appears to have precipitated the move by demanding congressional action in a social media post earlier on Wednesday.
“Real peace requires neutral humanitarian agencies, not those serving as an arm of Hamas,” the Israeli envoy to the global body in Geneva, told JNS.
The Israeli premier invoked Passover’s Ten Plagues, citing “ten blows” against Iran and “ten achievements,” including Israel’s unprecedented coordination with the United States.